Texas A&M-CC
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
238  Philipp Baar SR 32:17
1,028  Jason Garcia SR 33:42
1,311  Edgar Maritinez SO 34:03
1,339  Cesar Gonzalez SO 34:05
1,470  Justin Adame SR 34:16
1,528  Logan Pittdman FR 34:21
1,758  Valentinas Rudys SR 34:40
1,796  Daniel Guerrero SO 34:42
1,906  Steven Galli FR 34:52
1,971  Stephen Medlin FR 34:58
2,126  Jordan Wright FR 35:13
National Rank #119 of 311
South Central Region Rank #9 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 34.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Philipp Baar Jason Garcia Edgar Maritinez Cesar Gonzalez Justin Adame Logan Pittdman Valentinas Rudys Daniel Guerrero Steven Galli Stephen Medlin Jordan Wright
Islander Splash 09/26 1118 32:26 34:16 34:09 34:04 33:59 34:12 34:28 34:34 34:57 35:07
Incarnate Word Invitational 10/11 1239 33:59 34:13 35:15 35:15 34:51 34:44 35:01 35:25
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1073 32:15 33:31 33:47 33:48 33:42 34:47 34:45
Southland Conference Championships 11/03 1094 32:13 33:47 34:02 34:21 34:30 34:13 34:33 36:00
South Region Championships 11/14 1138 32:28 33:22 34:16 35:13 34:24





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.3 334 0.1 0.4 3.4 9.8 21.2 24.6 17.2 12.5 7.2 3.0 0.5 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Philipp Baar 45.7% 156.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Philipp Baar 9.8 0.3 1.7 4.8 6.6 7.6 8.3 8.3 7.0 6.8 5.5 4.7 3.9 3.8 3.3 2.3 2.1 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3
Jason Garcia 62.8
Edgar Maritinez 82.8
Cesar Gonzalez 84.1
Justin Adame 93.5
Logan Pittdman 97.6
Valentinas Rudys 112.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 0.4% 0.4 7
8 3.4% 3.4 8
9 9.8% 9.8 9
10 21.2% 21.2 10
11 24.6% 24.6 11
12 17.2% 17.2 12
13 12.5% 12.5 13
14 7.2% 7.2 14
15 3.0% 3.0 15
16 0.5% 0.5 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
South Alabama 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0